Trading directors fight back

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

NMA published a response from Mauricio Leon to my piece on trading directors. 

His argument boils down to the fact that long-term partnerships are about much more than just price - for example, they will typically include improved service-level agreements, research projects and exclusive opportunities.

That's fair enough, and I wasn't really arguing that cheap was bad per se - in fact it's easy to argue that most digital media is over-priced.  My point really is that by negotiating individual deals, you can take a client's requirements into account and create a bespoke package that will probably be better value in the long run.

As for the access to research, that can often be negotiated as part of relatively small buys, so I don't see that as a serious argument.  The fact is that trading directors are there to get the best prices for their clients and to maximise profits for their agencies - but not necessarily in that order!

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.indolent.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Trademark bidding - still not safe to enter the water
Google's green light allowing brands to bid on competitive trade marks was one of the big stories in UK search…
Improved 404 pages thanks to Google
I've blogged about 404 pages before - they are something of a hidden optimisation opportunity for most websites.  You see…
Giving good Powerpoint
So many Powerpoint presentations are dull and lifeless that it's easy to surrender all hope.  In fact tons of times…
David Cameron tag cloud
Following on from last week's tag cloud of Gordon Brown's big speech, here is the full text of David Cameron's…
It's dead Kate's birthday
I had a somewhat bizarre automated email from Bebo reminding me that it is Kate Modern's birthday on the 1st…
Go to full blog