Trading directors fight back

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

NMA published a response from Mauricio Leon to my piece on trading directors. 

His argument boils down to the fact that long-term partnerships are about much more than just price - for example, they will typically include improved service-level agreements, research projects and exclusive opportunities.

That's fair enough, and I wasn't really arguing that cheap was bad per se - in fact it's easy to argue that most digital media is over-priced.  My point really is that by negotiating individual deals, you can take a client's requirements into account and create a bespoke package that will probably be better value in the long run.

As for the access to research, that can often be negotiated as part of relatively small buys, so I don't see that as a serious argument.  The fact is that trading directors are there to get the best prices for their clients and to maximise profits for their agencies - but not necessarily in that order!

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.indolent.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Why does a salad cost more than a Big Mac?
Thanks to the wonderful Valerie Casey of the Designers Accord for showcasing this fab infographic at her SXSW keynote.  The…
South By Heat Map
Here's a heat map of my week at SXSW based on Four Square data mapped to Where Do You Go. …
Is too much math killing marketing?
I'm now back from my trip to Austin and pleased to say that the panel session went just great!  Big…