Trading directors fight back

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

NMA published a response from Mauricio Leon to my piece on trading directors. 

His argument boils down to the fact that long-term partnerships are about much more than just price - for example, they will typically include improved service-level agreements, research projects and exclusive opportunities.

That's fair enough, and I wasn't really arguing that cheap was bad per se - in fact it's easy to argue that most digital media is over-priced.  My point really is that by negotiating individual deals, you can take a client's requirements into account and create a bespoke package that will probably be better value in the long run.

As for the access to research, that can often be negotiated as part of relatively small buys, so I don't see that as a serious argument.  The fact is that trading directors are there to get the best prices for their clients and to maximise profits for their agencies - but not necessarily in that order!

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.indolent.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mike Teasdale published on June 15, 2007 2:38 PM.

Trading directors - really so evil? was the previous entry in this blog.

Trading directors strike again! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.