Digital advertising: May 2008 Archives

Ah, haven't blogged for a while, but luckily Precision Marketing has come to the rescue by publishing an article I wrote on digital's over-obsession (I think) with data.  Here it is:

Data, data, data. Everyone in digital marketing loves data. All those beautiful ones and zeros, streaming in realtime from websites, banner campaigns, email and all the rest.

Sadly some of that data isn't quite as solid as we might hope.

"Take something as simple as a visitor to your website. No two analytics companies have precisely the same definitions for a visitor, or a unique visitor, or a repeat visitor. So it is pretty much impossible to run two different sets of analysis on your website, and to get the figures to agree.

Avinash Kaushik, Google's analytics evangelist, writes about customer pathway analysis: "What Is It Good For? Absolutely Nothing." He is equally scathing about one of the most quoted online metrics, the website conversion rate.

When it comes to allocating sales to online activity, the standard rules for calculating cost per acquisition are just plain silly. To use a fight analogy, the last punch wins - which means that the last recorded click on a banner or text link gets all the credit for the sale. In truth, the 'fight' was won by a long and random combination of editorial, online advertising, Web searches and any amount of offline activity.

I suggest that once in a while the digital industry ignores its mountains of precious data, and instead bases its decisions on nothing more scientific than hunches and instincts.

We might just start thinking that eye-catching display campaigns on leading portals have more brand value than text links on dozens of affiliate sites. We might believe that search marketing is about as good for building brands as a small classified ad or that online advertising which is fun, involving and relevant is also more likely to build positive brand attributes.

As an experiment, ask your agency or web team to report on digital activity without touching Excel or Powerpoint. Ask them to tell you a story about how your customers felt before your campaign, how they were moved by it, and how it made them feel afterwards.

You just might discover more insight in that story than in the next million cells of Excel.
I'd guess that many visitors to the BA site for Terminal 5 will be looking for some kind of reassurance that British Airways and BAA have finally got the airport working properly.

Instead you find a website which is blindly pretending that nothing ever went wrong in the first place.  Here's the page on the baggage system which in reality was so disastrous that it led to some 20,000 bags being stranded at Heathrow and ultimately meant that flights had to be cancelled to avoid more chaos.

British Airways baggage


'Baggage has never moved so fast' boasts the website.  'The baggage system... will move your baggage as fast as 30mph on a total of 18km of belts. The long conveyor belts and intelligent baggage carts running on miles of rails mean that your bag can reach Baggage Reclaim in around 15 minutes.'

Or never, in the case of many bags.

Wouldn't it be better to at least acknowledge that with all this technology there are bound to have been teething problems, but things are much better now?

For most sites, clicking the logo will bring you back to the home page.  But clicking on the 'Upgrade to British Airways Terminal 5' logo actually brings you to an apology for how bad things have been - which is a strange use of the word 'Upgrade'.

Ah well, perhaps the web master is too busy lugging bags around the baggage system - which by the way was 'road tested to perfection'.

Oh dear!  

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Digital advertising category from May 2008.

Digital advertising: April 2008 is the previous archive.

Digital advertising: June 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en